01
Discovery
Domain workshops, bounded context mapping, and ADR checkpoints reviewed by senior engineers.
We publish our delivery system in detail so technical buyers can evaluate our process, constraints, and safety controls before a call.
Every engagement has one primary objective: accelerate delivery without surrendering engineering judgment.
A concrete operating model with explicit human ownership and measurable quality gates.
Human: Domain workshops, stakeholder interviews
AI: LLM-assisted bounded context mapping, competitive architecture analysis
Gate: ADRs reviewed by senior engineers
01
Domain workshops, bounded context mapping, and ADR checkpoints reviewed by senior engineers.
02
AI accelerates boilerplate while humans own architecture decisions and review gates.
03
Quality gates target ≥90% coverage and ≥75% mutation score before release approval.
04
SLOs, rollback rehearsals, and launch runbooks are complete before production cutover.
Objections from technical leaders are legitimate. These controls are non-negotiable in our delivery process.
| Failure Mode | How We Prevent It |
|---|---|
| Hallucinated code | Every AI-generated function requires a human-authored test and reviewer approval. |
| Security vulnerabilities | AI-generated code passes automated SAST and dependency checks before human review. |
| Architecture drift | Pattern library constraints prevent unauthorized architectural patterns from entering the codebase. |
| Over-reliance on AI | PRs above a 70% AI-generated ratio trigger mandatory architecture review. |
| Prompt injection | LLM-facing flows use validation, filtering, and sandboxed execution by default. |
Bring your current architecture, quality concerns, and timelines. We’ll map where AI helps and where it hurts.